Ultimate Guide: Pellet Tube vs. Smoke Generator

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Review of the Smoke Generator
   • 2.1 Description and Brand
   • 2.2 How it Works
   • 2.3 Lighting the Smoke Generator
   • 2.4 Duration and Smoke Production
   • 2.5 Issues and Challenges
   • 2.6 Cost and Availability
   • 2.7 Pros and Cons
3. Review of the Pellet Tube
   • 3.1 Description and Brand
   • 3.2 How it Works
   • 3.3 Lighting the Pellet Tube
   • 3.4 Duration and Smoke Production
   • 3.5 Comparison with Smoke Generator
   • 3.6 Pros and Cons
4. Conclusion

Review: Smoke Generator and Pellet Tube for Smoking

Smoking food is a beloved cooking technique that adds unique flavors and aromas to dishes. To enhance the smoking experience, many enthusiasts turn to accessories such as smoke generators and pellet tubes. In this review, we will evaluate two such items purchased on Amazon - a smoke generator and a pellet tube. Please note that this review is not sponsored or affiliated with any particular brand.

Review of the Smoke Generator

2.1 Description and Brand

The smoke generator under review is sold by a company called Kakulu and is available on Amazon. It operates by burning chips the size of sawdust, which can be purchased separately. The smoke generator is designed to last for several hours and is advertised to be compatible with tea lights for ignition.

2.2 How it Works

To use the smoke generator, you fill it with the sawdust chips, making sure to keep the level below a designated wire line. The idea is to use a tea light to ignite the chips, which in turn smolder and create smoke. However, the tea light method has proven to be less effective, requiring alternative ignition sources such as torches.

2.3 Lighting the Smoke Generator

While the smoke generator claims to be compatible with tea lights, not all tea candles fit the designated hole. This limitation raises concerns about the advertised convenience and usability of the product. Additionally, the stainless steel construction of the generator does not accommodate the insertion and removal of tea lights easily.

2.4 Duration and Smoke Production

During testing, the smoke generator did not live up to expectations. After approximately three hours of burn time, it produced a minimal amount of smoke and required relighting multiple times. These inconsistencies and the limited smoke production make it ill-suited for longer smoking sessions.

2.5 Issues and Challenges

The smoke generator faced several challenges during testing. Despite following the instructions and keeping the sawdust below the designated line, the generator often went out prematurely. The tiny holes on the wire mesh that allows air circulation might be too small, hindering airflow and causing the generator to extinguish.

2.6 Cost and Availability

The smoke generator is priced at $23.99, making it relatively expensive compared to alternatives. Additionally, the sawdust chips required for operation are priced at $19.99 for two two-pound bags. The availability of these accessories on Amazon ensures convenience for users.

2.7 Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Stainless steel construction
• Compatibility with tea lights (though not all sizes fit)
• Easy availability on Amazon

Cons:

• Inconsistent performance and short burn time
• Limited smoke production
• Reliance on alternative ignition sources
• Higher cost compared to alternatives

Review of the Pellet Tube

3.1 Description and Brand

The pellet tube under review is the stainless steel Frica Frikkka brand, purchased on Amazon for $12.99. It offers an alternative method for adding smoke flavor to food during cooking and is widely available at a more affordable price compared to the smoke generator.

3.2 How it Works

Similar to the smoke generator, the pellet tube burns wood pellets to produce smoke. The tube's design, with its flat sides, prevents rolling and provides stability for positioning. It is a foot long and ideal for shorter smoking sessions, though longer options of up to 18 inches are available.

3.3 Lighting the Pellet Tube

To use the pellet tube, simply light one end and let it burn for five to ten minutes until a good coal forms. Blow out the flame and place the tube in the desired location for smoking. The airspaces between the pellets allow for airflow, ensuring consistent smoke production.

3.4 Duration and Smoke Production

During testing, the pellet tube performed flawlessly, smoking continuously for six and a half hours without any issues. This extended burn time makes it ideal for longer smoking sessions, and multiple tubes can be used consecutively for even more extended periods.

3.5 Comparison with Smoke Generator

Compared to the smoke generator, the pellet tube offers a more reliable and consistent smoking experience. It produces a significant amount of smoke, addressing the primary concern with the smoke generator. Additionally, the lower cost and longer burn time make the pellet tube a more attractive option for smoking enthusiasts.

3.6 Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Stainless steel construction with flat sides for stability
• More reliable and consistent performance
• Longer burn time (up to 6.5 hours)
• Affordability compared to smoke generator

Cons:

• Limited availability of longer tube options

Conclusion

After careful evaluation and testing, it is clear that the smoke generator falls short in terms of performance and usability. Its inconsistent smoke production and the need for alternative ignition methods are significant drawbacks. On the other hand, the pellet tube offers a more reliable and satisfying smoking experience. With its longer burn time, consistent smoke production, and affordable price, the pellet tube proves to be the superior choice for smoking enthusiasts.